[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?

To: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?
From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:21:26 +0400
CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <758d5e7f0607270327h2b558f2dnbe57bc844c0f7d25@mail.gmail.com>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi
References: <758d5e7f0607270327h2b558f2dnbe57bc844c0f7d25@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)

Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> Recently I was thinking about upgrading ZMailer and I came
> to the www.zmailer.org's sources list.  The latest release is
> 2.99.57.pre3 from 14 July 2004, and latest "not pre" release
> is 2.99.56 from 18 November 2003.
> 
> I know ZMailer is a very solid code, but we're living in dangerous
> times of spam warfare, so one may think "2 years is a lot of time
> in life of mail server".  It made me wonder -- perhaps ZMailer
> users take CVS snapshots and use them in production environment?
> 
> Also, is the 2.99.57 version somewhere on the horizon?

Most of the time, latest CVS version is perfectly OK to use.
(that is, unless Matti is in the process of updating/debugging it at the
moment you are checking out... that is not very often;)

Eugene

OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?
  - From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@netbauds.net> (Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:29:25 +0300)

References:
- Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?
  - From: "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?
Next by Date: Re: Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?
Prev by thread: Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?
Next by thread: Re: Which ZMailer version to use - CVS or 2.99.57.pre3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread