[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ESMTP in banner query ?

To: Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru>
Subject: Re: ESMTP in banner query ?
From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@netbauds.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:28:43 +0100
CC: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <44C717CE.5020509@rol.ru>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi
References: <44C6F53D.4090205@netbauds.net> <44C717CE.5020509@rol.ru>
Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060614 SeaMonkey/1.0.2

Eugene Crosser wrote:
> Darryl Miles wrote:
>> I notice there is the -E option to the SMTP TA to re-enable this check
>> and act accordingly.  Are there any known implications to doing this ?
> 
> Apparently -E enables the aforementioned hack.

So this has never been mandated by any RFC ever ?  It has always been 
perfectly valid to try the EHLO and get back invalid command and then 
retry with HELO ?

Darryl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ESMTP in banner query ?
  - From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru> (Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:09:34 +0300)

References:
- ESMTP in banner query ?
  - From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@netbauds.net>
- Re: ESMTP in banner query ?
  - From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru>

Prev by Date: Re: ESMTP in banner query ?
Next by Date: Re: ESMTP in banner query ?
Prev by thread: Re: ESMTP in banner query ?
Next by thread: Re: ESMTP in banner query ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread