RE: SMTP file naming issue?

["Neal Morgan" <Neal@morgan-systems.com>]

Thanks.  I don't see any indication of a problem with the messages being
handled properly.  I agree Zmailer is working fine.

My issue is visibility.  I don't see an easy way from my logs to match
messages leaving SMTP with those traversing external processes, and back
when re-entering the router.

Maybe I should ask my question differently.  Is there an easy way to
include the spoolID in the envelope (on the comment line) or append it
to the message header?

Alternatively, how difficult would it be to use spoolID as the file
name?  ...would that cause problems elsewhere?

I'm guessing the envelope approach would be easiest.  Suggestions?




-----Original Message-----
From: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi [mailto:zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi] On
Behalf Of Carlos Mendioroz
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:40 AM
To: Neal Morgan
Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: Re: SMTP file naming issue?

If the naming scheme is the old one, name comes from inode number.
So if the name is reused, you should count on the old one having been
taken care of.
-Carlos

Neal Morgan  @ 3/6/2006 2:58 -0400 dixit:
> Hello Matti!
> 
> I've been watching the files dropped into postoffice/router by
incoming
> SMTP sessions and I note the same file name is used several times.
I'm
> wondering if this is configurable, or a bug...  I have an external
> process that acts on the messages before the router picks them up for
> delivery.  I'd like to be able to track "chain of custody" per message
> using this file name, but am unable to do so if SMTP reuses the same
> name.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Neal Morgan
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi