[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: newaliases and multiple DBs

To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: Re: newaliases and multiple DBs
From: Devin Reade <gdr@gno.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 20:50:06 -0700
In-Reply-To: <64650000.1007259437@eich>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-outgoing
References: <64650000.1007259437@eich>
Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi

Hmmm.  I'll followup to my own message here and state that it appears
that if you rebuild the aliases via 'zmailer newdb' vice 'newaliases',
then the additional DBs get compiled.  Is there any reason that one
would want different behavior there, or is it an oversight?
--
        Devin Reade        <gdr@gno.org>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi

References:
- newaliases and multiple DBs
  - From: Devin Reade <gdr@gno.org>

Prev by Date: newaliases and multiple DBs
Next by Date: RE: SFIO Compile Problems with latest Release and CVS
Prev by thread: newaliases and multiple DBs
Next by thread: MAIL FROM discarded
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread