Re: The mailq service

[VIP Lists Account <viplists@vip.maestro.com.pl>]

On Mon, 29 Jun 1998 mea@nic.funet.fi wrote:

> > which also didn't work. So, I tried yet different solution - I added the
> > mailq service to /etc/inetd.conf and restarted inetd. As it was to be
> > expected, inetd refused to service this port since the socket was already
> > in use by zmailer. I'm running Zmailer 2.99.50-s5.
> 
> Yes, but you didn't configure your ZMailer with  --with-tcp-wrappers
I did. I used the Red Hat spec file for zmailer which has it by default.

> parameter ?   If you did, was it able to find <tcpd.h> file ?
Yes it was. 

> How about -lwrap ?
Linked in.

> In 3.* series the 'mailq' protocol will be modified so that nobody
> gets in to do queries/administer without proper per-user authenticator.
Excellent! Speaking of features. Is there anything in the plans about
adding any capability for the pop3/imap servers to use zmailer aliases (I
mean other than modifying them to read the databases directly)?