[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.99.50(snap4) now at ftp.funet.fi (was: Re: Spam help.)

To: Alvin Starr <alvin@iplink.net>
Subject: Re: 2.99.50(snap4) now at ftp.funet.fi (was: Re: Spam help.)
From: Andy Poling <andy@globalauctions.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 00:49:41 -0400 (EDT)
cc: mea@nic.funet.fi, zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91.980525094953.19592A-100000@caesar.iplink.net>

On Mon, 25 May 1998, Alvin Starr wrote:
> Is it safe to assume that No valid Email source will be sending mail from 
> a non resolved address?

No.  In fact, it is not uncommon to receive mail from a host whose
nameserver is unreachable or slow to respond, leading to your inability to
perform a reverse lookup...

-Andy

Global Auctions
http://www.globalauctions.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.99.50(snap4) now at ftp.funet.fi (was: Re: Spam help.)
  - From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net> (Tue, 26 May 1998 07:57:36 +0300)

References:
- Re: 2.99.50(snap4) now at ftp.funet.fi (was: Re: Spam help.)
  - From: Alvin Starr <alvin@iplink.net>

Prev by Date: Rewriting UUCP-style address...
Next by Date: Re: 2.99.50(snap4) now at ftp.funet.fi (was: Re: Spam help.)
Prev by thread: Re: 2.99.50(snap4) now at ftp.funet.fi (was: Re: Spam help.)
Next by thread: Re: 2.99.50(snap4) now at ftp.funet.fi (was: Re: Spam help.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread